<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for librarylimbo.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarylimbo.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarylimbo.net</link>
	<description>navigating the interstitial spaces where libraries, information, technology, and people meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cataloging Module Improvements by Adam Epp</title>
		<link>http://librarylimbo.net/cataloging-module-improvements/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Epp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarylimbo.net/?p=107#comment-11</guid>
		<description>So basically an IDE for catalogers. That&#039;s a really good idea. The main problem you are going to run into is copyright issues between the people who are creating the cataloging module and the people who own the various documentation programs that they use. I hate to say it, but OCLC is probably in the best position to pull this off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically an IDE for catalogers. That&#8217;s a really good idea. The main problem you are going to run into is copyright issues between the people who are creating the cataloging module and the people who own the various documentation programs that they use. I hate to say it, but OCLC is probably in the best position to pull this off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

